Dear Readers:
I am sorry for the lack of posts, but my workload continues to be greater than originally anticipated. As such, the blog will be on hiatus until further notice.
Tuesday, September 10, 2013
Wednesday, June 12, 2013
Workload Overdrive
Unfortunately, this week's workload prevents me from providing a proper post. Expect one in two weeks.
To tide viewers over, here is an example of what is eating my time this week. It is also a clever preview for the next odd corner.
To tide viewers over, here is an example of what is eating my time this week. It is also a clever preview for the next odd corner.
Thursday, May 30, 2013
Pronghorn
Male pronghorn at the San Diego Zoo
Illustration of various-aged pronghorn.
Image from
Much of the
pronghorn seems bent on defying standard classification. Unlike many other
animals living on the plains of the American Midwest, pronghorns enjoy distinct
coloration. The overall coat bears a rust or amber color, with bright white
markings along the neck, head, belly, and rump. Males also have black patches
on their faces and cheeks, perhaps to gain the attention of females. The
animals live in herds…sort of. Some males remain with a harem of females.
Others create territories and faithfully guard them, neglecting the social
structure of a herd. Additionally, while females usually stay together, they
will abandon the group to give birth to their fawns. Unlike bison or musk ox,
the herd offers not protection to its young ones, so leaving other females may
prevent predators from finding the fawns quite as easily. Perhaps the most
confusing aspect of the pronghorns is their namesake. Male pronghorns, as well
as some females, have dark projections on their heads. Like horns, they are
cornetless and made of keratin. However, they also display tines, or branches.
The tines often make the distinct “prongs” providing the animals with their
name. However, they can also curve, droop, and branch into distinct shapes in
some individuals. Also, they fall off once a year, much like antlers. The
distinct headwear separates pronghorns from modern animals, although fossil
records show at least twelve ancient species. All bore strange branching
crests, and all existed solely in North America. In current times, only one
species remains.
As a result of the modern pronghorn’s unusual characteristics, naming the animal proved difficult. Scientifically, the creature is known as Antilocapra americana. The name translates to “American horned animal” or “American she-goat.” The “goat” term was one of the first used by Western explorers. American slang, tales, and songs also refer to pronghorn as “antelope,” as in “where the deer and the antelope play” fame. Most modern sources refer to the animals as pronghorn, pronghorn antelope, or antelope, although some ranchers and hunting enthusiasts may refer to them as speed goats.
Fossil of Stockoceros onusrosagris, an extinct pronghorn species, at
the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles
For all the
confusion the animals cause linguists and classification, no one doubts their
capacity. Antelope display an amazing ability to survive in the plains of the
American Midwest. Their coat manages to keep them cool in the summer, but sheds
water in the winter. Pronghorn also thrive on vegetation cattle and deer cannot
gain nutrients effectively from, making them ideal for the grazing
opportunities of the Midwest. Typically, antelope detect danger through
eyesight, which some researchers compare favorably to binoculars. Once
pronghorn identify a source of danger, they run. The animals maintain the
record for long distance speed. While cheetahs manage to run at over sixty miles
per hour, they can only maintain such speeds for a few seconds. By contrast,
pronghorn run for several miles at a time, although the actual speed is
debated. Most biologists agree the animals can gallop between thirty and
forty-five miles per hour, but getting antelope to cooperate with speed
measuring equipment proves difficult. As a result of their speed, antelope can
easily evade most of their predators, including coyotes, eagles, and wolves. In
the rare event speed fails, the pronghorn can fight back using powerful hooves,
strong legs, and pointed headwear.
Since pronghorn
offered such a pleasing challenge to hunters, they became a popular sport
animal. Like their neighbors, the bison, pronghorn once filled the plains with
a population spanning the millions. Also, like bison, they were nearly hunted
to extinction. After decades of unlimited hunting, the herds of millions quietly
dropped into groups of a few hundred animals. Fencing also proved devastating
to the animals. Unlike deer, pronghorn do not typically jump well, so fences
intended to keep sheep and cattle safe blocked the antelope from grazing and
watering sites. Hunters, concerned about the loss of a popular animal, began to
actively conserve remaining antelope. With the support of protective measures,
such as reserving land, limiting hunts, and raising awareness, pronghorn
numbers returned. While a few subspecies remain in doubt, the overall
population exists in the Least Concern aspect of the IUCN Red List.
Two female pronghorn and a fawn from the North American Mammal Hall
at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles
With such a
survival story and so many unique characteristics, it seems odd that pronghorn never
really manage to attract crowds at zoos and museums. Perhaps the animals are
simply too small to inspire interest. A large male can weigh roughly one
hundred fifty pounds, a featherweight compared to the ton maintained by most
bison. Bison themselves may rob antelope of attention, since the larger, more
powerful animals undoubtedly represent the plains in most visitors’ minds.
Maybe the success of the antelope robs them of their attention. Since they are
now, for all practical purposes, common, they do not maintain the charisma
necessary for attracting attention. Rarity gathers interest, but survivability
tends to be ignored. Also, they may simply be too strange to maintain guest interest.
While the horns, colors, behaviors, and histories of the animals remains
distinct, they also prevent antelope from attracting interest through
familiarity. For whatever reason, pronghorn remain distinct, attractive
occupants of odd corners.
View of the Pronghorn Display at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles
Thursday, May 16, 2013
The Great Auk
Stuffed great auk specimen at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles,
believed to be one of the last two hunted.
believed to be one of the last two hunted.
Meticulous, or just lucky, museum-goers
may find a stuffed or skeletal great auk tucked into an odd corner. Fortunate
museums may even have an egg of the water bird. However, no museum will ever
contain a living specimen. The great auk, also known as the garefowl, went
extinct in 1844.
Ink drawing of great auk.
Casual visitors run the risk of mistaking the
birds for penguins. The misunderstanding is reasonable. Like many members of
the auk family, the bird did enjoy penguin-like coloration. During the summer,
great auks, much like the penguins of the south, had pale bellies and black
backs. An oval-shaped white patches adorned either side of the bird’s face
before each dark eye. However, the birds also changed their colors with the
seasons. The winter plumage mirrored the summer coloration, although the light
eye patches faded to black and the white belly feathers banded across the nape
and chin. As the largest member of the alcid family, great auks stood at an
impressive three feet tall. Despite the admirable height and tuxedo-like
pattern, the bird managed to avoid a regal appearance through its ridiculously
tiny wings. The wings, roughly the same length as those belonging to a bird
half the great auk’s size, resided low on the bird’s body, making them even
more comical. Seemingly compensating for the dainty appearance of the wings,
the thick, heavy bill reveals an intimidating amount strength. While the beak
effectively snapped small fish, the weight of the beak also crunched through
the shells of crustaceans. Strangely, the beak bore three to twelve grooves.
The purpose of the grooves remains undetermined, but some scientists suspect
they relate to age. Also, some specimens have the grooves painted white. Since
the colors of bird’s hard parts typically fade quickly, painting the beak and
feet is fairly standard in the maintenance process. No description mentions
white grooves, though, so they may result from speculative taxidermists.
Detailed shot of great auk's face.
Note the large bill and white eye patches.
Despite the bird’s appearance, it is not
related to penguins. Unlike penguins, great auks lived exclusively in the
Northern Hemisphere. They especially favored the rocky coasts of the North Atlantic,
thriving in Iceland and Canada. In such areas they were, ironically, called
penguins. They actually had the name before the famous birds of the south. When
northern explorers first encountered the black-and-white southern birds, they
named them after the more familiar great auk. Eventually, the northern birds
lost their name to the south-dwellers, even though they were not, in fact, remotely
related to each other.
Image from the Illustrated Alphabet of Birds.
Great auks are, unsurprisingly, related
to auks, sometimes referred to as alcids. The alcid family includes puffins, guillemots,
murres, and auklets. All members of the family reside in fairly cool northern
climates. They also spend much of their lives at sea. Like penguins, they used
their wings to dive into the ocean, occasionally reached depths of over 500
feet. Unlike penguins, though, they use their flat, webbed feet to swim at the
ocean’s surface. Additionally, most members of the alcid family fly
effectively, if inelegantly. The garefowl attracts attention since it was
flightless in a mostly flying family. Yet, the inability to fly made it perfect
for the water. Large, flight-worthy wings create drag, preventing the birds
from diving effectively. Small wings set back on the body gave the birds a
streamline shape better suited for reaching the ocean floor and its tasty
occupants. As a result, great auks could reach otherwise unavailable food
sources.
Close-up of great auk's ridiculously tiny wings.
While the birds were made for the ocean, their
specialization was fatal on land. The inability to fly made the birds
vulnerable when nesting, so they would raise their young in huge colonies,
providing the auks with safety through numbers. Since they relied on such large
groups, a single pair would often fail to raise young without the presence of
hundreds of other birds. Additionally, the garefowl bred slowly. Due to limited
resources, such as space, warmth, and food, the great auk, like many other
alcids, only produced one offspring every season. Generally, the birds enjoyed
unusual longevity for fowl, so they could still produce enough young to
maintain healthy numbers. Prolonged interference with breeding, though, could
and, sadly, would shatter the entire population.
Front view of the great auk at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles.
In the birds’ native habitat, they provided
vital resources for the local human population. Trees and other conventional
fuel sources do not exist near most of the great auk’s former rookeries, so the
birds provided vital light and warmth through their oil. Their flesh also gave
vital nourishment in areas with limited livestock or hunting options.
Eventually, the birds also supplied a source of income. Eggs, while often
eaten, became highly collectable by European and American scientists and hobbyists.
Feather hats fell in vogue in the early 1800’s, so hunters would deliberately
hunt the birds for the attractive black and white plumes. Some records suggest
the birds suffered greatly in the process. A few statements suggest the birds
were plucked while alive, then released to die due to exposure. Naturalists
also claim hunters burned the birds alive to cook their fellow alcids.
Currently, some historians cast doubt on such records, due to the racism and
cultural bias of the recorders. Still, no one doubts the effects of constant
hunting.
Image of a great auk published by Popular Science Monthly: Volume 33.
The results of the limitless collections took
their toll. Pressure from economic and lifestyle hunting steadily made the
birds scarcer. In a gross sort of irony, the rarity of the birds increased
demand for specimens from museums and hobbyists, resulting in even more hunting
than usual. Eventually, the number of the birds slipped to a point where the
large colonies, so vital for breeding, failed to reach appropriate numbers. The
last successful hunt occurred in 1844, resulting in the capture of a pair and
the destruction of their egg. Some sightings were recorded in the years after
the hunt, but many doubt the authenticity of such sightings. Even if they were
accurate, the numbers seen could not possibly result in the large groups needed
to repopulate the northern waters. The great auk was, effectively, extinct.
A quartet of extinct North American birds.
Natural History Museum of Los Angeles.
Visitors wishing to find a great auk can only
discover them through illustrations and specimens. Seventy-eight stuffed birds
reside in various holdings throughout the world. The speckled eggshells of the
great auk reach seventy-five in number. Yet, the bird remains strangely
unpopular. Other extinct species, such as the dodo and Tasmanian tiger evoke
strong feelings, guilt, and activism, while the great auk seems to avoid such
attention. Perhaps it looks too similar to its living southern namesake to attract
public interest. For whatever reason, the great auk seems destined to quietly
reside in odd corners.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)